Testing Einstein

This book will dissect, one by one, the most important and best-known experiments said to confirm special relativity.
Its central argument is that, as a self-contradictory theory, special relativity has not been-and cannot possibly be-verified by any physical experiment. On the contrary, without exception, these experiments fail to support it and often run counter to it.

A central myth about Relativity is that it is a great theory that overturned classical physics, as established by Sir Newton.
The Autopsy of Special Relativity: From A Logical Point of view examines this claim. In logic, no discipline can overturn its own foundation. Special relativity is built on classical physics. If classical physics were wrong, then relativity could not be logically right.
In its structure, special relativity looks like an inverted pyramid. A large amount of mathematics rests on two simple physical postulates: the principle of relativity and the constancy of the speed of light. It demonstrated that these two postulates are logically incompatible and in conflict with each other. A theory built on contradictory assumptions cannot be valid. A self-contradictory theory cannot be correct.
A second myth, closely related to the first, is the wrong belief that relativity has been confirmed by very numerous experiments.
As a continuation of The Autopsy of Special Relativity, this book aims to examine and eliminate this mistaken belief.