Operation Corporate

his paper explores the development of an operational approach to secure the Falkland Islands following the Argentine invasion on 30 March 1982. The Falklands Islands campaign is a case study of operational art and the development of an operational approach by the military leaders of the United Kingdom. Operational movement, force employment, and the influence of national policy decisions all contributed to the modification and adaptation of their campaign plan. This campaign, characterized by joint maritime and land operations in a distributed area of operations, provides a way ahead for the application of operational art in emerging contingencies based on an understanding of the relationship between theory, joint doctrine, and actual execution of tactical actions. Joint Operational Access Concept precepts and their application during this campaign provide relevance to ensure access during forcible entry operations. JOAC principles focus on the requirement to develop an operational approach, along multiple distributed lines of operation, employing precision strikes at operational distance, and denying or defeating the enemy's anti-access or area denial capabilities. Using a historical case study serves as a proof of concept to provide a compelling narrative and cautionary tale regarding the implementation of this operational access concept.

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work was reproduced from the original artifact, and remains as true to the original work as possible. Therefore, you will see the original copyright references, library stamps (as most of these works have been housed in our most important libraries around the world), and other notations in the work.

This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work.

As a reproduction of a historical artifact, this work may contain missing or blurred pages, poor pictures, errant marks, etc. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.